Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Record low invoice values ‘reveal inflation sting’
A 2023 Advent Calendar for our clients
Average refund plummets by $580, total payout down $5.4bn
FBT – Christmas Parties and Taxi Fare/Rideshare
Annual wage growth surges to 14-year high of 4%
Is My Organisation Exempt From the Spam Act?
Employee Christmas Parties and Gifts – Any FBT?
Most Expensive Wars In History
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) motor vehicle data matching program extended
Directors on the hook for cyber security, ASIC warns
I am making a profit but where does all the cash go?
Using the cents per kilometre method for claiming car expenses
Scams by numbers - 2022–23 scam data is now available
Completing the Sale of a Business
Business owners are seeking exits without a plan, survey finds
Most powerful countries throughout time.
Super tax concession changes: consultation
ATO interest charges soar to highest level since GFC
TOP 5 CHALLENGES FOR FAMILY BUSINESSES
ATO linking system takes giant stride into business
Cyber threats facing small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs)
Most powerful LEADERS of All Time
How Do I Respond to an Allegation of Trade Mark Infringement?
$20k instant asset write-off to get 1-year extension
Contractor payments (TPAR) are increasingly on the ATO’s radar
Superannuation and independent contractors: fresh Full Federal Court guidance
Intergenerational Report 2023
Property investors beware: new data matching program
When will we learn to protect ourselves from ourselves?
Federal Government toughens up employment laws.
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2023
Quarter 2 April - June 2023
Quarter 1 January - March 2023
Quarter 4 October - December 2022
Quarter 3 July - September 2022
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Superannuation and independent contractors: fresh Full Federal Court guidance

 

In February 2022, the High Court handed down a landmark decision in ZG Operations v Jamsek, which clarified the test for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor.

 



 


The High Court remitted the question of whether the workers were “employees” under the extended definition of that term in s 12(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (the SGA Act) back to the Full Federal Court.


In deciding that the relevant workers were not “employees” under the extended definition in s 12(3), the Full Federal Court determined that s 12(3) does not apply to an independent contractor relationship where the worker uses a company, trust or other service vehicle to contract with the putative employer instead of doing so in their personal capacity. This confirms the ATO’s guidance in Superannuation Guarantee Ruling SGR 2005/1.


Additionally, in determining whether a worker is an “employee” under the extended definition in s 12(3), the Full Federal Court has confirmed that a worker will not be taken to work under a contract that is “wholly or principally for [their] labour” in the following circumstances.


Finding

Comment

The contract is for labour and non-labour (eg the provision of substantial capital assets or the assumption of risk) components, and based on a quantitative valuation, the non-labour components predominate.

In many independent contractor relationships, the contractor may be required to provide their own tools and equipment. Whether the contract is principally for labour or alternatively the provision of capital assets and the assumption of material risks is likely to turn on a valuation of the labour and non-labour components respectively.

The worker has the ability to delegate the performance of work under the contract to other persons.

The party that bears the onus of proof will need to substantiate the value of the labour and non-labour components through evidence.

The worker is engaged under a contract for a “result”.

This finding is consistent with previous case law and ATO guidance. The workers had a contractual right of delegation in this case.


 


Employers are required to provide their employees with a minimum level of superannuation support (currently 10.5%) each quarter, otherwise the employer will become liable to pay the superannuation guarantee charge. An “employee” for these purposes includes an employee at common law.


The SGA Act also includes a number of provisions which extend the meaning of “employee”. Relevantly, s 12(3) of the SGA extends the meaning of “employee”, so that: “If a person works under a contract that is wholly or principally for the labour of the person, the person is an employee of the other party to the contract.”


This provision is broad and captures many independent contractor relationships. An entity that engages an independent contractor under a contract of this nature is required to provide the contractor with superannuation support (otherwise they will become liable to pay the superannuation guarantee charge).


Whilst there is nothing new about these conclusions at such a high judicial level, this is a prudent time to review independent contractor relationships.


Expansion of the superannuation net is inevitable.


 


 


AcctWeb




26th-September-2023

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation