Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Covid-19 resources
Historic $130bn wage subsidy to cover 6 million workers
Stage 2 – Covid-19 stimulus package.
Covid-19 Update - Small Business
PM launches $17.6 billion virus stimulus plan
SG amnesty bill passes Parliament
ATO flags most common SMSF return mistakes
Expected GDP by country 2010 to 2100
ATO expands small business review pilot
A resource hub for our clients.
Risks when dating documents in 2020
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) debts may affect your credit rating
Statistical picture of Australia - Update
Absentee Property Owner – Tax Whack - Victoria
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill
There’s still time to move to Single Touch Payroll (STP)
Real Time World Population Growth - Wow!!
ATO audits continue to target Lifestyle assets
Property deduction errors down to ‘lack of understanding’: ATO
Data can be great stuff! - Australia
GST refunds for returned imported goods
14k employers, $230m in super: Financial Services Minister defends proposed SG amnesty
Bushfires 2019–20 (ATO)
Accounting profession responds to bushfire crisis
Helping your business survive a natural disaster - ATO
Single Touch Payroll (STP) – now ensure super is paid on time.
Beware of Australian Taxation Office (ATO) impersonation scams
Australia by the Numbers
‘Visible, valued and owned’: ATO outlines super priorities for new year
Introductory Rates & Interest Free Periods
Articles archive
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 4 of 2013
Articles
Penalty for unsubstantiated work-related deduction claims
Death, divorce, relationships and complications
Buying a Property
Plumbers were full-time casuals, not contractors
Resources on our site to help you, your family and/or your business.
Merry Christmas to all our clients, your staff, family and friends.
Residency requirement for CGT home exemption failed
Residency Tested Again - Taxpayer Loses
Parent liable to CGT on half-share of townhouse
ATO information on everyday issues.
Victorian Fire Services Property Levy
Penalty for unsubstantiated work-related deduction claims

 

The AAT has recently affirmed a decision of the Tax Commissioner to impose a penalty on an individual equal to 50 per cent of the tax shortfall .....


... amount arising from deduction claims for work-related expenses that were unsubstantiated.

 

 

 


     

 

The taxpayer made claims as a car salesman for work-related expenses of $30,000 plus for several years.  The Tax Commissioner determined that most of the claims were unsubstantiated and imposed a penalty of approximately $6,000, representing 50 per cent of the tax shortfall of the 2012 year.

The individual did not dispute that the claims were unsubstantiated, but argued that the penalty was severe and that he was unable to pay all of the penalty.  The AAT noted, among other things, that the individual did not retain invoices or receipts, or provide satisfactory evidence to substantiate the claims.  The AAT was of the view that the individual's conduct was more serious than mere failure to take reasonable care, and held that the penalty imposed was appropriate.

It is not clear if the other years were also subject to penalties – if not the taxpayer may have got off lightly!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



17th-December-2013