Latest Accounting News
Hot Issues
Part 1 – Budget reminders. Under the Hood.
Part 2 – Budget reminders. Under the Hood.
Part 3 – Budget reminders. Under the Hood.
Comprehensive list of COVID-19 initiatives and packages.
Businesses not meeting obligations warned as ATO restarts compliance programs
Employers cautioned over ‘hard and fast’ decline in turnover eligibility
‘Follow the spirt of the law’, warns ATO
$120m in JobKeeper clawed back by ATO, new compliance areas highlighted
Budget 2020 - A very comprehensive break down.
Budget 2020 - Fact Sheets
Budget 2020 - At a Glance, Overview, Outlook
Temporary home office expenses shortcut extended again
JobKeeper extension – changes implemented
JobKeeper Participants – are “workers”
Commissioner registers updated JobKeeper alternative tests
Varying Pay As You Go (PAYG) Instalments
Reminder of Medicare Levy Surcharge (MLS)
September update of latest COVID-19 initiatives.
ATO JobKeeper 2.0 guidance surfaces
Expats Return to Australia – Travel Expenses
Profession to be relied on for post-JobKeeper turnover certificates
Update of Superannuation contribution rules from July 1, 2020
Expats & COVID-19 Impacts on tax residency
Economic recovery could be slower than anticipated: RBA
High Court rules in favour of employers on personal leave accruals
Articles archive
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 July - September 2014
Quarter 2 April - June 2014
Quarter 1 January - March 2014
Quarter 4 October - December 2013
Quarter 3 July - September 2013
Quarter 2 April - June 2013
Quarter 1 January - March 2013
Quarter 4 October - December 2012
Quarter 3 July - September 2012
Quarter 2 April - June 2012
Quarter 1 January - March 2012
Quarter 4 October - December 2011
Quarter 3 July - September 2011
Quarter 2 April - June 2011
Quarter 1 January - March 2011
Quarter 4 October - December 2010
Quarter 3 July - September 2010
Quarter 2 April - June 2010
Quarter 1 January - March 2010
Quarter 4 October - December 2009
Quarter 3 July - September 2009
Quarter 2 April - June 2009
Quarter 1 January - March 2009
Quarter 4 October - December 2008
Quarter 3 July - September 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2008
Quarter 1 January - March 2008
Quarter 2 April - June 2007
Quarter 2 April - June 2006
Quarter 4 of 2013
Articles
Penalty for unsubstantiated work-related deduction claims
Death, divorce, relationships and complications
Buying a Property
Plumbers were full-time casuals, not contractors
Resources on our site to help you, your family and/or your business.
Merry Christmas to all our clients, your staff, family and friends.
Residency requirement for CGT home exemption failed
Residency Tested Again - Taxpayer Loses
Parent liable to CGT on half-share of townhouse
ATO information on everyday issues.
Victorian Fire Services Property Levy
Penalty for unsubstantiated work-related deduction claims

 

The AAT has recently affirmed a decision of the Tax Commissioner to impose a penalty on an individual equal to 50 per cent of the tax shortfall .....


... amount arising from deduction claims for work-related expenses that were unsubstantiated.

 

 

 


     

 

The taxpayer made claims as a car salesman for work-related expenses of $30,000 plus for several years.  The Tax Commissioner determined that most of the claims were unsubstantiated and imposed a penalty of approximately $6,000, representing 50 per cent of the tax shortfall of the 2012 year.

The individual did not dispute that the claims were unsubstantiated, but argued that the penalty was severe and that he was unable to pay all of the penalty.  The AAT noted, among other things, that the individual did not retain invoices or receipts, or provide satisfactory evidence to substantiate the claims.  The AAT was of the view that the individual's conduct was more serious than mere failure to take reasonable care, and held that the penalty imposed was appropriate.

It is not clear if the other years were also subject to penalties – if not the taxpayer may have got off lightly!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



17th-December-2013